<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google is an Ad Agency, not a library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediasystems.com/blog/google-is-an-ad-agency-not-a-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediasystems.com/blog/google-is-an-ad-agency-not-a-library/</link>
	<description>805-827-2450 Build Market and Improve Your Business 805-827-2450 with  social media marketing services, cutting edge website development, and advertising agency services.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solomon Rothman</title>
		<link>http://socialmediasystems.com/blog/google-is-an-ad-agency-not-a-library/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Solomon Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediasystems.com/11/19/google-is-an-ad-agency-not-a-library/#comment-422</guid>
		<description>I agree, I actually like the pay per post model as a way for regular blogger to earn revenue from their sites.  Blog posts aren&#039;t impartial no matter how objective one attempts to be.  Everyone has to make money or earn some type of return off their investment.  Google wants to make absolutely sure any business models in direct competition with Adsense (that provide SEO benefits as well) receive the least amount of traffic they can get away with.  If they go too far they risk becoming irrelevant, so most of the penalties at this point are scare tactics (reducing PageRank without taking away rankings).  It&#039;ll be interesting to see Google&#039;s response to Social Spark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I actually like the pay per post model as a way for regular blogger to earn revenue from their sites.  Blog posts aren&#8217;t impartial no matter how objective one attempts to be.  Everyone has to make money or earn some type of return off their investment.  Google wants to make absolutely sure any business models in direct competition with Adsense (that provide SEO benefits as well) receive the least amount of traffic they can get away with.  If they go too far they risk becoming irrelevant, so most of the penalties at this point are scare tactics (reducing PageRank without taking away rankings).  It&#8217;ll be interesting to see Google&#8217;s response to Social Spark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

