Click stars to vote (left is low, right is high)
If you do any research on SEO you’ll find this statement repeated more then any other “make sites for users not for search engines.” It even appears in the the guidelines of the webmaster help center right on Google.com. It’s one of the core fundamentals in what’s considered “white hat” SEO or SEO that conforms to all of the search engine guidelines in the interests of improving the web.
From a strictly logical standpoint, the “make sites for users not search engines” is a fundamentally flawed statement because users find sites through search engines, so by definition, if you make a site for users, you have to take in consideration how they’re most likely to find it � via a keyword search.
This does not mean you have to disobey any guidelines or try to “trick” or “fool” algorithms; you just can’t look at this concept as an independent vacuum. For example, it’s very important for sites to use keywords in header and title tags. If you took the “make sites for users not for search engines” statement literally, you may be tempted to use creative page titles, but for most sites this would be a huge mistake. For Google or other search engines to understand what your page is about, you need to actually use the words people will be typing into the search engines when looking for content. It’s your job as a website owner to use keywords in your links, pages, headers, etc that are actually relevant to your document.
Further, if you research specific niche keywords that are less competitive, but will still bring you traffic, and then slant your content to be more attractive to people looking for that topic, you’re “making sites for users using search engines to look for relevant information.” I feel this is a more accurate statement than the old meme that is spouted repeatedly.
I believe you should take search engines into account every aspect of your site from the design to the monetization strategy. Consider what the user will be thinking about and what their needs are in conjunction with how the search engines work.
As Aaron Wall of SEO Book says in his post “Bad Advice That Sounds Good“:
“‘Create your website for users, not for search engines.’ Why do I hate it? Search is marginalizing many publishing business models. To pay for the costs of creating link worthy content it makes sense to add a significant amount of lower cost highly monetized filler to a website. “
It’s a good post; check it out if you have the chance. Websites that make money from PPC advertising (like Google Adsense) really need to take into account users and their interactions with the search engines. I call this “monetization with search in mind”
For example, say your website revenue model advertiser-based through Adsense and you have one page of great content. If you add filler and expand it to 3 or 4 pages, you could potentially make a lot more money through a greater number people clicking on your ads. By diluting your content, you could make more money and thus be able to afford to create more content, build a better site, and service your users. By filler, I just mean average content, like ___ basics, top ten _____, or _______ FAQ; stuff your visitors may read, but may not win links over all the other available content. This example takes into account both the user and how he or she will find your site, instead of only thinking about everything one-dimensionally. (I’m not actually advising this; it’s a specific example and would only apply to a select set of sites).
So even though it’s repeated on Google’s Webmaster guidelines and restated over and over again by SEO consultants. I think it needs to be clarified or given a context to have any real meaning. So I like to say “build your website for users using search engines to find it.”
Technorati Tags: seo advice, search engine optimization, google webmaster guidelines, Google, search engines, SEO
The Author: Solomon Rothman
About: Solomon Rothman is currently the CIO for socialmediasystems.com. He authors multiple blogs which are syndicated by publications like Webpronews and is recognized as an expert author on search marketing & web design / development. Solomon has worked for multiple .com companies and subcontracted as a both a designer and search marketing consultant for both large and small corporations. Solomon loves the ongoing challenges and creativity the online marketing world requires to be successful. Besides technology, Solomon's other passions include filmmaking & screenwriting.
This entry was posted by Solomon Rothman, on Friday, March 2nd, 2007 at 2:27 pm and is filed under Search Engine Marketing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response below.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. PLEASE register now and you'll be able to fill out a profile, upload an avatar or picture of yourself and get a FREE link to your website. After commenting you can use the same login to join in our forum discussions. If you haven't done so already subscribe to this site. We're always adding new information and we would love to have you participate.
Join the Discussion in Our Social Media Marketing Forums
Discussion Forum
| Topic | Posts | Last Poster |
|---|---|---|
| Different uses of Social Media | 4 | shrestha12 |
| Costs of a social marketing campaign | 2 | LSteinberg |
| Forum Posting Guidelines | 1 | Solomon Rothman |
| Social Media Rocks Any Business Plan | 3 | Pokergirl |
| Good and bad navigation examples: | 9 | |
| Interested in other people's suggestions for a good feature... | 1 | Stephmie |
| Internet based tools: | 12 | |
| Trouble writing articles? | 1 | aurorabrown |
| A little wordpress tip about uploading docs. | 1 | markwalker |
| Computers versus Common Sense (CYC Video) | 2 | aurorabrown |









